2. Determination Doctrine, the fact that the Defendant could have had a number of force due to an in-houseless employment, most of which was committed in the year 2017 is disadvantageous.

However, in full view of the various sentencing conditions indicated in the argument in this case, including the fact that the defendant was working for self-support by entering a facility for homeless persons, and there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment, the prosecutor’s above assertion is without merit, since the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and it is not

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.