The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower court in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of all of the facts charged in the instant case’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., vehicles that attempted to flee) and violation of the Road Traffic Act (i.e., taking measures subsequent to an accident). In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.