손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except where the following judgments are added under the first instance court’s fifth, thereby citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(1) The court below's findings and determination of the first instance court is just in light of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court of first instance, and there is no error as alleged in the ground of appeal by the plaintiff). 2. The part added on February 2, 2014 consented that the defendants are liable for damages to the plaintiff's association equivalent to the labor cost due to the employment of unnecessary employees in the second regular society of 2014. Since G and H were reinstated, the plaintiff should compensate for damages equivalent to the labor cost equivalent to the labor cost of new employees.
The Defendants’ act was intentional or negligent in doing so.
The plaintiff's above assertion is without merit, since it can not be acknowledged that the plaintiff suffered damage to the plaintiff or that it caused damage to the plaintiff.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.