공사대금
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the following 2. Additional Judgment as to the allegations emphasized by the parties, and therefore, it is citing it as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
2. Additional determination
A. The plaintiff's assertion and determination (1) The plaintiff asserted that since 59,722,569 won was increased due to design modification, the defendants should jointly pay the above increased construction cost and damages for delay to the plaintiff.
(2) According to the reasoning of the judgment below, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 14, Eul evidence Nos. 1, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and E of appraiser E of the first instance trial, on April 7, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works with the Defendants on multiple houses (19 concrete structure room and five sand position panel room) on the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D land owned by the Defendants (hereinafter “instant contract”). After then, the Plaintiff and Defendants entered into a contract for construction works with the Defendants on multiple houses (hereinafter “instant contract”). Since then, the Plaintiff and the Defendants came to know about about about 20 square meters of the building on adjoining land adjacent to the said land at the latest, the Plaintiff changed the design by reducing three concrete structure rooms and one sand position panel room at the time of signing the contract, and the Plaintiff paid 49,500,000 value-added tax to the Defendants at the time of signing the contract with F and E of May 28, 2014, the Plaintiff’s appraisal and construction work price No. 2514, and 25.