When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives C 110 C. C. O.C.

On February 14, 2017, the Defendant driven an over-to-face 20:40 on the front side of the oil station in Daegu Northern-gu, and brought about the direction of the victim F (25 years old)'s G vehicle entering the course of the victim F (25 years old) while driving from the right side of the Saemaeul to the four-distance side of the port side of the Saemaeul-gu, Daegu-gu. The Defendant, using the Defendant's vehicle, which is an object dangerous to the objection, was frightened to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant, on the part of the victim's vehicle in front of the victim's vehicle, has been driven by him/her, obstructed the course by doing it in front, and operated three times, and made it clear that the victim's vehicle is faced with, and made it possible for him/her to do so in a normal manner, and threatened the victim by driving Obba, which is a dangerous object, so that the victim's vehicle may not take part

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the victim's vehicle was changed in the future of the victim's vehicle to enter the destination approximately 50 meters prior to the defendant's motion picture CD [the defendant and his defense counsel did not drive retaliation, but changed the victim's vehicle in order to enter the destination about 50 meters prior to the victim's vehicle, and that the victim's vehicle which was behind the change of the victim's vehicle was made a brake to look at the rear by sliding the whistle without any special reason, and that there was no intention to make any special intimidation.

In light of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, ① the victim’s vehicle entered the future when the victim’s vehicle entered the future, the victim’s vehicle was immediately moved to the side line, and immediately changed the vehicle in the future of the victim’s vehicle, and immediately immediately after the change of the vehicle, the victim’s vehicle was rapidly operated, and ② the Defendant was putting a light on the victim’s vehicle that entered the future, and immediately after the change of the vehicle, the victim’s vehicle will remain in the future.