However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On October 22, 2011, at the residence of Defendant A, the Defendants: (a) performed drinking together with the Victim F (F) who was found to drink in a usual inside and outside of the mouth of Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, 407 Dong-gu, 509; and (b) performed drinking together with the victim F (F) who was found to have been under the influence of alcohol; and (c) reduced the victim’s conspiracy with face-to-face (Evidence 1) in that place.

As a result, the Defendants committed indecent act against the victim who is unable to resist jointly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H;

1. Defendant B led the Prosecutor’s suspect interrogation protocol on Defendant B, which led the Prosecutor to the effect that “the Defendant, along with his face, felled with the victim’s conspiracy.”

In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined in this court, the following facts and circumstances were revealed, namely, (i) Defendant A presented the victim’s conspiracy with a woman who was frightened by the victim at the time of the time; (ii) the defect that the victim knew about the victim’s frightion; and (iii) Defendant A stated that Defendant A was frightly and frighted to leave the victim’s house; and (iv) Defendant A made a consistent statement with Defendant B, who had been frightened until the victim’s mind again; and (v) Defendant A had frightly frightened with the victim, who had frightened the victim, and had frightened the victim, “I fright the victim, who was frighten and frighted.”

Therefore, the defendant A and the two pages are applied.