If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No person shall use any trademark similar to the registered trademark of another person on goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2019. 5. 20. 21:20경 대구 동구 B에 있는 피고인이 운영하는 ‘C’ 상호의 매장에서 대한민국 특허청 상표등록원부 제0309448호에 등록된 ‘샤넬’ 상표와 유사한 상표를 표시한 가짜 상품인 지갑 2개를 손님들에게 판매하여 양도할 목적으로 진열대에 전시하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant used a trademark similar to the registered trademark of another person on goods identical or similar to the designated goods, thereby infringing trademark rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Written statements (D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (written appraisal and original trademark register);

1. Article 230 of the Trademark Act and Article 230 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 236(1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;