If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was on board the 440-1 Hong-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, for the unification of Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around 00:50, on the 440-1 Hong-ro, and did not speak to the destination; and (b) did not speak at the destination; and (c) the Defendant was living in the future only in the future; and (d) the Defendant asked the destination of the destination.

70 over 70:

The law of the Republic of Korea, however, has carried out very rough words and actions to the effect that “a person” is doing so.

Therefore, the injured party, who caused the threat, set a taxi at the Seodaemun Police Station Traffic Safety Center, reported the destination of 112, and then asked the destination and proceed again, but the Defendant, even though he/she is proceeding again after asking the destination, he/she is the victim’s “the fech fech fec.

H. N. N. N. police division

whether or not,

Before the desire to the purport of this chronia, the victim’s taxi business was obstructed by force for about 20 minutes, such as launching the front glass, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the analysis of black stay images);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;