However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Around 22:20 on January 5, 2015, the Defendant, at the “C” restaurant located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, and had not paid the price, recommended the F to calculate the drinking value and return back to the country after receiving a report from D, the proprietor of the above restaurant business, and recommended the said F to do so, the police officer assigned to the Sungnam-gu Police Station E box called the above F to write down the drinking value. After the said F, the Defendant, who was sent to the said police box, recorded the f’s face of the f’s face, and the police officer assigned to the above police box called the f’s face of the f’s face of the b’s face of the b’s face of the b’s face of the b’s face of the b’s face of the b’s back

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;