If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 30, 2014, the Defendant, without authority at the modern maritime fire insurance center located in Jungcheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, without the authority, instructed the policyholder C and the insured to employees in the name-free dividends of the Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance (State) of the said branch to enter into the 100-year-old disease insurance contract, regardless of whether he/she is a non-related party to the contract, each contractor of the letter of subscription, the written consent to process personal (credit) information for the conclusion, performance, etc. of the contract, and the personal (credit) information processing consent for the introduction of the goods, the policyholder column of the product description stating that he/she explained important matters of the above insurance, the payer of the letter of consent to collect and use personal (credit) information for the conclusion, performance, etc. of the contract, and the explanation of the possibility of damages in the event of the transfer of the insurance contract, and the contractor column of the comparative confirmation letter and the name column of the FCAC himself/herself's letter of confirmation.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged one subscription form, including the above form, which is a private document on rights and obligations in the name C for the purpose of exercising the right.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (on the second date);

1. Part C of the protocol of interrogation of the defendant by the prosecution against the defendant

1. Details of details of solicitation of E;

1. To describe a copy of the subscription form and apply the existing Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act and Article 231 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) include some of the circumstances that may be taken into account in the course of the instant crime, and the fact that the instant case does not cause financial damage to the victim: Provided, That the Defendant has a record of having been punished for the same kind of crime, etc., and the sentence shall be