사해행위취소
1.(a)
Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against Defendant C Regional Housing Association shall be revoked, and the revoked part shall be applicable.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this part is that “each of the instant certificates” was added after the fifth (5) judgment of the first instance court, and the fifth (5) and third (3) of the fifth (5) are the same as the entry of “1. Facts” among the reasons for the first instance judgment, and thus, this part is accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The first part of the above part is that “The Defendant Union shall have transferred the borrower July 13, 2010 to X (40,60,000 won for land purchase), X (30,600,000 won for principal and creditors), Y (30,600,000 won for interest), Plaintiff (30,000,000,0000 won for future), Plaintiff (30,000,0000 won for loan and 150,000,000 won for loan and 3) shares of the Association’s land under its name, and shall be 1.5 million,0,00,000,00,000.
A) prepare and deliver to the Plaintiff B.
2. The reasoning for the court to explain this part of the judgment on the defense prior to the merits is that each “G” of the 6th, 7, 12, and 7th, 11 of the judgment of the first instance court is dismissed as “the litigants of the network G,” and “Deposit” of the 6th, 11, and 12 of the 6th, “theO deposited, based on the relevant judgment, received the seizure and assignment of the claim against the third party of the Defendant H and the network G,” and the “the above Defendants” of the 7th, 12th, 7th, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 8, can be acknowledged as having received the order of seizure and assignment of the claim against Defendant H and the network G third party in accordance with the relevant judgment. However, the Plaintiffs.