[criminal records] On December 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the period of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court for eight months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 24, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 30, 2016, from around 19:40 to 20:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) ordered the victim’s coffee shop in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) however, the victim: (c) made a cryp by entering the cryp to the cryp; (d) caused the cryp to the cryp; (c) caused the cryp to the cryp to the cryp; (d) caused the cryp to the cryp to the cryp; (d) caused the cryp to the cryp to the cryp; and (d) caused the cryp to the cryp to the cryp to the cryp to the cryp to the cryp to the c

Defendant interfered with the coffee shop of the victimized person by force as above.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, has complied with the victim E, a police officer called up upon receiving a report of C 112, who was an employee C and the Defendant on the case at the time, at the same time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, while complying with the circumstances of the case.

The police life is equal.

C. The victims were openly insulting by referring to the so-called “the so-called “the so-called”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on the dispatch of the scene of the suspected incident, such as a report on occurrence, a disturbance in business, etc., or a complaint;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and the application of written judgment statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments for two crimes) is that the defendant's mistake is divided.

However, the crime of this case is special.