건물명도 등
1. Defendant B: (a) the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant);
(a) Annex 1, 2, 3, and 4. among the fourth floors of the building listed in the separate sheet.
1. Determination as to the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B
(a)the reasons for the indication of the claim and the reasons for each alteration are as stated in the separate sheet of claim;
(b) Judgment on deemed confession of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);
2. We examine both the Plaintiff’s principal claim against Defendant C and D and the principal claim and counterclaim against Defendant C and D.
A. Facts of recognition 1) The plaintiff is the E-Appellee (the next, the plaintiff church is the plaintiff church).
(2) On October 30, 2012, Defendant C entered into a lease agreement of KRW 40,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 600,000, among the buildings listed in the attached list owned by the Plaintiff church and the Plaintiff church.
3) On February 2014, Defendant C demanded the return of the lease deposit to the Plaintiff on the ground of the termination of the lease contract period, but upon the failure to refund the lease deposit, Defendant C entered into a lease agreement with the Seoul Northern District Court 2014Kao862 on July 21, 2014 and concluded a registration of the lease deposit on October 30, 2012. Defendant D entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff church and the attached list of KRW 40 million on KRW 504 on October 30, 2012 with respect to KRW 40,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 600,000.
5) Defendant D demanded the return of the lease deposit to the Plaintiff upon the expiration of the lease term on October 2013. However, as the lease deposit was not refunded, Defendant D received the lease registration order under the Seoul Central District Court Order 2014Kaga884 on February 19, 2014 and completed the registration of the lease on April 3, 2014.
B. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff is not the plaintiff church but the party to the lease contract. The plaintiff sought the return of unjust enrichment from the rent party and the object of the lease by the date of the completion of delivery. The defendant C and D seek the return of each lease deposit after deducting that the rent is sealed.
(c) the facts of recognition and the foregoing.