All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles

The table string is that the defendant was laid on the wall in the process of making the victim E, and it is not that the victim F.

B) The Defendant was unable to anticipate that the victim F was marging from his own window to leave the site and was the death marging. 2) The sentencing of the lower court of unreasonable sentencing (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too unjustifiable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances as to whether the Defendant committed an assault against the Victim F, the lower court’s determination on the mistake of facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine regarding the Defendant’s assertion 1) can be acknowledged that the Defendant committed an assault in a way that has displayed the kitchen knife on the Victim F, and such an act also constitutes an assault as an exercise of physical force against the Victim’s body.

① E은 이 사건 발생 당일 받은 참고인 조사에서, 피고인이 부엌칼을 가져와서 “니네 오늘 다 죽여버리겠다”고 하면서 자신을 찌르는 시늉을 하고, 자신과 피해자가 있는 쪽을 마구 칼로 찔렀고, 피해자가 무릎을 꿇고 “잘못했습니다”라고 하면서 비는데도 피고인은 자신과 피해자를 계속 칼로 찌르는 시늉을 하면서 “이런 씨발년, 더러운 년, 걸레 같은 년, 이 개새끼, 오늘 다 죽여버린다”고 하였다고 진술한 바 있는데, 피고인 역시 경찰 제2회 조사 시에는 피해자를 직접 칼로 찌른 사실은 없으나, 피해자와 E 앞에서 칼로 찌를 것처럼 허공에다 대고 찌르는 시늉을 한 사실이 있다고 진술하고 있다.

② In addition to the display of knife, E is an investigative agency.