The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the concept of “false fact”, “purpose of influence” and “influence” and “self-defense” in the crime of violating the Act on

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.