2. The Defendant is making a confession of each of the instant crimes, and health conditions are not good due to urology, high blood pressure, brain color, etc.

According to the response of each fact-finding by the police officer of the Gyeongnam-nam Regional Police Agency, the defendant was arrested as a narcotics offender in cooperation with the investigation.

However, taking into account the following factors: (a) the amount of narcotics handled by the Defendant is large; (b) the types of narcotics are diverse; (c) the number of times they are administered and inhaled; (d) the number of times of punishment for the same kind of crime has been punished several times; (b) the recidivism was conducted without being familiar with the period of repeated crime of the same kind; and (c) other factors of sentencing as shown in the instant records and pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime; and (d) circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, as it is too far within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.