For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment that found the facts charged of this case guilty and acquitted.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, and did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by violating the principle of direct psychological and court-oriented trials.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.