건물인도등
1. Defendant D Co., Ltd.:
A. Indication 1, 2, 3, 4, 1 of the attached drawings in the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E, F, and G land.
1. Recognizing the facts based on the basis of the facts as stated in the separate list of “the cause of claim” and each of the amended lists of “the cause of claim.”
The list or drawings in the above list are not separately indicated for convenience.
[Ground for recognition] Defendant C: The Defendant Company’s company for service by public notice under Article 208(3)3 (Service by Public Notice) of the Civil Procedure Act: The absence of dispute, each entry in Gap’s evidence 1 through 6 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant company
A. 1 As to the cause of the claim, each of the buildings listed in Section 1-A(a) of the Disposition No. 1 that the Plaintiff and I concluded (hereinafter “No. 1”).
(1) A lease agreement related to a lease agreement (hereinafter “No. 1 lease agreement”)
(1) No. 1 of the text of the Agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant
(b) and (c);
The lease contract (hereinafter “No. 2 lease contract”) related to each building listed in the port (hereinafter “building No. 1”) is stipulated as “C” in the lease contract (No. 1-2).
However, the Plaintiff stated that the Defendant Company is a lessee at the full bench’s request for explanation of whether the lessee of the second lease agreement is C or the Defendant Company, and the Defendant Company also has no particular dispute over such assertion.
In the case of a lessor’s request for removal of the facilities, etc. installed by the lessee, it is known that the lessor was determined to the effect that the lessor should remove the facilities, etc. at the lessee’s expense, and that the lessor should provide such facilities, etc. without compensation and move
Before filing the instant lawsuit, there is no dispute between the parties as to the fact that the Defendant Company had already succeeded to the status of tenant under the first lease agreement from I.
On the other hand, each lease contract of Nos. 1 and 2 was terminated on February 27, 2019, each term of existence of which expires.
[Plaintiffs] Notice sent on November 2, 2018 (No. 2) (the document No. 1) is served on the Defendant Company, and each of subparagraphs 1 and 2.