However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C on August 22, 2012.

On April 5, 2013, at around 22:45, the Defendant had a sexual intercourse with B and once with B in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of the above A, and even at the time and place prescribed in paragraph (1), the Defendant had sexual intercourse with A once as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The suspect interrogation protocol prepared as proxy for the Defendants

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of the marriage relation certificate and the Acts and subordinate statutes of the institute of divorce lawsuit;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting the crime: Defendant B of the main sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act (commencing point): the latter part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act and the full text (inters

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: