1. At around 08:40 on March 19, 2016, the Defendant, while driving a Crocketing car and driving a central highway near the name, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, in Daegu, was involved in ensuring the safety distance, violating the method of overtaking, etc. to threaten or endanger others, or causing danger to traffic.

Accordingly, the defendant was scambling.

2. On March 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 08:50 on March 19, 2016, the Defendant: (b) called the “victim,” at the 33133rd Road before the Korea Highway Corporation; and (c) when the victim’s face was sent to the Defendant, due to the defect of the claim, with regard to the climatic driving.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (such as a report on the confirmation of the image of a motor vehicle black box at the time of committing the crime);

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 151-2 and 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes are favorable to the defendant's recognition of the crime, or the defendant's crime of this case is conducted cherbly on an expressway by taking a sudden bracking, etc., and the nature of the crime is not good, and the victim's assault is not agreed with the victim, and the defendant has several records of violence in the same way, and the criminal investigation agency has no faultd with the victim from the investigation agency to the above court, and other unfavorable circumstances of sentencing are considered, and the punishment as ordered shall be determined like the order.