Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On October 14, 2015, the Defendant: “Around October 14, 2015, the Defendant needs to pay money to the victim B to the victim B in the mutual influence of the location of the Jung-dong branch of Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu.”

On November 25, 2015, if one lends KRW 3 million, he/she will repay the money to another by November 25, 2015.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, in fact, the Defendant’s wife did not have any intention or ability to repay the said money until November 25, 2015, while the Defendant’s wife was going to study abroad or in an emergency situation abroad, and the said money was not paid by November 25, 2015.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 3 million won as the borrowed money from the injured party on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Second-time protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police in B;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (suspects, daughters C) and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines (including where the defendant has agreed with the victim, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;