The defendant.

A. The facts under the recognition of facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence 1 to 6 and Eul evidence 1.

(1) Under the National Health Insurance Act, the Plaintiff is an insurer of the health insurance that provides citizens with insurance benefits for prevention of disease and injury, diagnosis, medical treatment, and rehabilitation, for childbirth death, and for improvement of health, and E is the insured of the health insurance conducted by the Plaintiff, and the Defendant is a mutual aid provider that has concluded a mutual

(2) On December 17, 201, at around 19:55, A, who is the above taxi driver, was driving the above taxi and turned to the left-hand turn-hand turn-off of the cmate in front of the cmatet located in the Sim-gu Busan Sim-gu, Busan, from the embbbs of the embs, he turned to the above taxi.

(3) From March 28, 2014 to August 28, 2015, E received medical treatment and prescriptions from the so-called so-called “the instant accident” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”). The Plaintiff provided each of the above medical care institutions with KRW 56,753,119 (the amount of KRW 44,58,850, KRW 10,06,160, KRW 2,188,100, KRW 109, KRW 21,327,160, KRW 160, KRW 2058, KRW 2058, KRW 2055, KRW 10, KRW 2055, KRW 20, KRW 205, KRW 205, KRW 205, KRW 305, KRW 205, KRW 205, KRW 2585, May 28, 2014).

(Specific details are as shown in the annexed sheet). B

Judgment

According to the above facts, the defendant is responsible for compensating for the damage of the medical expenses suffered by E due to the instant accident pursuant to Article 724(2) of the Commercial Act as a mutual aid business entity A, who is the operator under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the plaintiff paid medical care benefits for the treatment of E, pursuant to Article 58(1) of the National Health Insurance Act.