2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

From March 28, 1986 to May 31, 2017, the Plaintiff is serving as an officer in the Air Force (facilities) branch of the Air Force from March 28, 1986.

On February 22, 1993, the former Construction Technology Promotion Act, which was a construction engineer, who had been discharged from military service and obtained a bachelor’s degree in construction engineering from the Department of Construction Technology in the Department of B University on Construction Technology, on September 20, 2008, and on December 7, 2018, as a construction engineer who acquired a qualification as a construction engineer in construction construction, defined the same qualification as “construction engineer.” However, as amended by Act No. 15719 on August 14, 2018, the term “construction engineer” was changed to “construction engineer.”

The Plaintiff reported the work experience as a construction technician to the C Association entrusted by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on June 2017 after discharge from active service.

On September 2017, the Office for Government Policy Coordination carried out the control of whether construction engineers retired from public institutions and administrative agencies were false or not, and as a result, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport asked the Ministry of National Defense to confirm the fact that the plaintiff discharged from the air force had falsely reported some of construction engineers accumulated in the C Association as C Association.

On April 27, 2018, the Air Force Headquarters notified by the Ministry of National Defense of the above request from the Ministry of National Defense, confirmed that the two business participation experience of the plaintiff is different from the fact and requested to delete it to the C Association. The C Association deleted the above work experience and requested the defendant to take an administrative disposition under the relevant Act and subordinate statutes.

The defendant, on February 1, 2019, reported the results of other departments on February 1, 1993 to December 29, 1993, 1D Corporation 1D Corporation participation period of 1993 to December 29, 1993, 2 E Corporation 2 E Corporation from December 26, 200 to January 741, 200, 200 to the plaintiff on February 1, 2019.

A disposition of suspension of business was issued six months (from February 23, 2019 to August 22, 2019) on the ground that a false report on the experience in the indication of the table was made.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [The grounds for recognition] did not dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 7, and Eul evidence 1 and 2.