However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 15:15 on December 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) at the Seosan-si Central G apartment games center, and “a hond hond hond hond hond hond hond hond hond hond hond hond hond hond hond hond na, which was called upon 112, committed assault by the Defendant, such as pond nath nath nath D and E, with a view to demanding a presentation of identification cards, pond pond pond nath nath nath nath nath nath nath nath nath nath nath

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of D or E;

1. 112 Report processing books; and

1. Application of CCTV CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act requires strict punishment as an offense detrimental to the legal order and the function of the State, by obstructing the exercise of legitimate public authority.

Considering the background, method, etc. of the defendant's assault, it is not good that the crime is committed.

However, the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime is considered in favor of the defendant.

Other conditions of sentencing, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of defendants, shall be determined as per the disposition.