2. Perjury is a crime that obstructs the proper exercise of judgment authority, which is a judicial action of the country, and the discovery of substantial truth, and requires strict punishment.

However, in a criminal trial against the defendant, the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and the defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won, regardless of the defendant's perjury, and it seems that the defendant's perjury was not significantly affected the result of the trial against D. The defendant has no record of criminal punishment prior to the crime of this case, and in full view of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., the court below's punishment is judged to be appropriate

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.