beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.09.14 2017고정93

자격모용사문서작성등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 12, 2016, at around 17:00, the Defendant: (a) stated “E”, “F”, “G”, “F”, “F”, “F” in the occupational column, “F”, “F”, and “A” in the contact column; and (b) affix the Defendant’s seal next to the name of A, after entering “A” in the International Development Chairperson of the document intermediate part of the document, at a cafeteria located in Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant prepared a letter of recommendation, which is a private document on fact-finding, using the qualification of the Jri Development Chairperson.

2. Around 09:00 on June 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) filed a letter of recommendation with the head of Seocheon-gun Office I of Seocheon-gun Office I of Seocheon-gun Office I of Seocheon-gun Office I of Seocheon-gun Office I of Seocheon-gun Office I of Seocheon-gun Office (hereinafter “Umcheon-gun Office”) to hold the private document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made against L, M, or N;

1. A copy of the minutes of development committee;

1. A copy of a letter of recommendation;

1. Application of the regulations concerning the appointment, etc. of the head of Seocheon-gun and the ordinances of the Ri Development Committee of Seocheon-gun;

1. Relevant Article 232 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the preparation of private documents for qualification) and Articles 234 and 232 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On June 12, 2016, the defendant and his defense counsel are selected as the temporary development chairperson of the J Council on the expiration of the term of office of the Jri Development Chairperson L and have qualifications therefor.

The argument is asserted.

2. However, according to the Municipal Ordinance of the Seocheon-gun Development Committee, the development committee chairperson shall be appointed with the consent of a majority of the incumbent members from among the development committee members, which is acknowledged by the evidence of the ruling.