However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 13, 2019, the Defendant received a complaint from the public service center of the Seoul Eastern District Public Prosecutor's Office located in 30, Songpa-gu Seoul District Public Prosecutor's Office, which requested B to be punished as the crime of forging private documents, the crime of forging the above investigation document, the crime of fraud, and the crime of false accusation.

Around December 7, 2016, the content of the above complaint was prepared by Defendant C’s lawsuit for the request for the performance of the procedures for the change in the name of the purchaser’s “C apartment units D” against the complainant, and the seller’s name was stated in the column of the seller, and forged by affixing his/her seal to the complainant’s name; the complainant’s name was written to the effect that the complainant received KRW 44,950,000 from the price; the complainant’s name was stated in the column of the issuer; the complainant’s name was affixed; and the complainant’s seal was affixed thereon; around October 201, 2018, Suwon District Court issued a lawsuit for the request for the performance of the procedures for the change in the name of the purchaser’s “C apartment units D, Hanam-si; exercised the forged document with evidentiary materials; and, at the same time, intended to obtain property profits by deceiving the purchaser’s name by using the forged document to the competent branch office around 11, 2018.

"The purpose is to".

However, the Defendant, while selling the “right to sell the apartment unit C apartment unit D” to B, was well aware that the Defendant directly signed and sealed the Defendant’s seal on the “real estate transaction agreement” and “certificate of receipt,” and that the said document was not forged.

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts to the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutors' Office for the purpose of having B punished criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendant’s written complaint, the supply agreement, the Stockholm text message, the content certification, the real estate transaction agreement, the receipt, and the response for proof of the content of the Defendant’s legal statement, as well as the written response, the written decision.