When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[2017 High Court Decision 736]

1. Around May 9, 2011, the Defendant stated that “Around May 9, 201, the Defendant would make payments to the victim B at a mutually aesthetic restaurant located in the Seosung-dong, Daejeon Sung-gu, Daejeon, that “Around May 9, 2011, the Defendant is engaged in the interior business, which shall deposit 640,000 won of the transaction for the interior of the interior of the interior of the money.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he will use the borrowed money to repay his personal debt, not the construction cost, and since there was no special property at the time and the unpaid amount of his personal debt and fine exceeds ten million won, there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money even if he borrowed it from the damaged person.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 640,000 won from one bank account, the mother of the Defendant, under the pretext of borrowing money from the injured party, and acquired it by fraud.

2. Crimes committed on May 16, 201;

A. On May 16, 201, the Defendant: (a) committed theft at a mutually aesthetic restaurant located in the Seo-gu Daejeon District of Daejeon, Daejeon on May 16, 201; (b) while the Defendant provided meals with the victim, the Defendant stolen a copy of the Non-Cock Card owned by the victim, which was located in the place where the victim was temporarily locked.

B. On the same day, the Defendant: (a) purchased precious metals equivalent to KRW 2,549,00 in the market price; (b) paid KRW 2,549,00 by presenting the stolen card as if the Defendant had legitimate right to use it; (c) but (d) there was suspicion that the victimized person is different from the name of the credit card holder and the Defendant; (b) requested the Defendant to produce identification card; and (c) the Defendant requested the revocation of the approval of the card to the effect that the Defendant was attempted.

[2017 High 983] On November 8, 2010, the Defendant raised the issue of F G cafeteria located in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon, as well as the issue of victim H(55 years of age) and the alcohol value.