However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

On February 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 22:15, in the vicinity of the rice field located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and (b) around 112, the Defendant: (c) was placed in the Police Team B of the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station, who was called up after receiving a report of 112 from the time of the failure to dismiss the prosecution as described in the facts charged as follows; and (d) was placed in the Defendant and E in order to decrease the Defendant, E and F.

“I, at present, you see as to whether I have been able to do so;

In doing so, C’s face was taken one time as a drink, and C’s breath was used as a breath, and the breath was used as a breath.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties to protect the lives, bodies, and property of the people, and to prevent and suppress crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act ( favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) is [the scope of recommendation] under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Public Duties, and there is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Public Duties (the grounds for sentencing between June and January 1, and June ] (the decision of sentencing), and the act of assaulting a police officer who takes a desire to perform public duties and takes a view to executing public duties: The act of assaulting a police officer who is disadvantageous to the execution of public duties must be punished in order to establish the public authority and legal order. There is a need to punish the defendant for a single suspended sentence. A favorable normal sentence for the defendant is an contingent crime that the defendant recognizes his/her mistake: The defendant is against the recognition of his/her mistake; the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family relationship, and all the conditions of sentencing set forth in the sentencing guidelines, and the suspension of execution of the indictment.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) on February 7, 2017, the Defendant along with the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Women’s Office E, one of the following: (b) on February 7, 2017.