If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 20, 201, the Defendant: (a) from the “Ddab” operated by the Victim C, which was operated by the victim C on September 20, 201, the Defendant was released from Ddab to the Defendant as an employee, 3.5 million won as the pre-paid payment.

9. To commence work from 24.24.

“The phrase was false.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to work as an employee in Dda.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 350,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative (E) account in the name of the Defendant at the agricultural branch located in the king of the Eup-Gu, Seogyeong-si on September 23, 2011 from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. C Complaints;

1. A list of deposit and withdrawal transactions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the loan certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;