A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. On October 19, 2016, at the E convenience store located in Jeju-si, around 06:37, Defendant A brought about a dispute with the victim B (30 tax) who is an employee of the E convenience store located in Jeju-si, with respect to the money, and the victim's neck away from the above convenience store and took her part of the victim's neck out of the above convenience store once, and her part of the victim's neck back to the victim's neck back to the convenience store. After diving, the Defendant 1 took part of the victim's gate back to the victim's gate back to the convenience store.

2. Defendant B, at the above date and time and place, suffered injury to the victim, i.e., by leaving the victim's face outside of the above convenience store and taking about two weeks of medical treatment. Defendant B suffered injury to the victim, i.e., by leaving the victim's face outside of the above convenience store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A legal statement of a witness;

1. A report on the occurrence of violence;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Investigation report (investigation of on-site CCTV verification), photographs;

1. Investigation report (Attachment to CCTV images of convenience stores), CDs;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (a) (a point of assault);

B. Defendant B: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury)

1. Defendants who choose to impose punishment: Each selective fine

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on Defendant B’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant does not have assault A as described in the facts charged.

2. According to the evidence adopted by this court and examined by this court, the fact that the defendant was suffering from the upper part of the Gap's upper part (Evidence No. 14 of the evidence record), the defendant visited and received medical treatment on the ground that the location of the upper left part of the Gap's upper part on the day of the instant case was changed and damaged by the dental, etc., and stated that the reason for the damage was the price by drinking, and the fact that the defendant was suffering from the upper part of the defendant's upper part (Evidence No. 14 of the evidence record);