When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who drives a K5-car.

On August 7, 2014, at around 01:50, the said vehicle driven the section on the street from the street in front of the influence area to the street 14-8 of the same erode from the street in front of the influence area to the street 50-8 of the same erode.g., the blood alcohol concentration is 0.171%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on traffic accidents, reports on driving of jun drivers, reports on de facto statements of jun drivers;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Partial reduction of fines prescribed by a summary order by taking account of the distance of the defendant's vehicle driven by the sentencing reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime. In light of the records acknowledged by the records of this case as to the defendant's assertion, in light of the situation of the defendant immediately after the driving of this case, the structure of the vehicle and the fish

In light of the fact that it is difficult to drive a vehicle solely by building the fish bars of a vehicle, etc., it is reasonable to deem that a vehicle was driven as stated in the judgment of the defendant.