명예훼손
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case, despite the fact that the Defendant made a statement to C as stated in the facts charged, is erroneous in the misapprehension of the facts in light of the summary of the grounds for appeal by C.
2. Determination
A. A. Around April 4, 2012, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant destroyed the honor of E by making a false statement to the purport that “The Defendant did not hold a bals photo or bals photo or bals photo of E, although he/she did not hold a bals photo or bals photo of E,” which he/she was parked in a parking lot near the Jung-gu District Court located in 364, 364, for the Government of the Republic of Korea.”
B. The lower court’s determination is difficult to view that: (a) the statement at E’s investigation agency and court stated that her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her......