A. At around 21:00 on June 10, 2012, the Defendant injured the victim’s body that the Defendant her husband E and her husband E and the victim F (son, age 69) were flick and fighting at the outside of the convenience store located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and obstructed the victim’s body that the Defendant her husband E and her husband F (son, she was 69 years old) one time.

The Defendant assaulted the victim and got the victim to go beyond the scope of the victim, thereby resulting in multiple diversities in need of treatment for about six weeks.

B. In light of the date and time set forth in Paragraph 1, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly by publicly citing the following sound to the victim, “I, J, K, etc., who are the victim of the above convenience store employees of the said convenience store, and the victim’s h, I, J, K, K, etc., and the victim, “I, I, and I, I, and I, h, h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.h. h.h.

2. The Defendant alleged that E and G are fighting and speaks with each other, and there is no fact that they have contacted the F’s body, and there is no fact that they made a insulting speech about F.

3. Determination

A. The evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case is the victim F, K investigation agency, and this court’s testimony and each injury diagnosis report.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the record, i.e., (i) the first statement that the Defendant was tightly pushed up the F with two descendants and that the F was divided into elbows (see, e.g., Articles 5 and 6 of the Investigation Record) and then the Defendant was divided into F by pushing up the F (see, e.g., Articles 18 and 41 of the Investigation Record). In this Court, the Defendant stated that the F was tightly pushed up and divided into F’s arms (see, e.g., Articles 18 and 41 of the Investigation Record). In this Court, the Defendant’s arms came to go beyond F by cutting up F with F’s arms and the Defendant was tightd with F’s wall.