The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of the modified facts charged, and there was no error by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on “credit business” in violation of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.