The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

1. On January 18, 2013, at around 15:00, the Defendants purchased from D 100,000 won, knowing that a cellular phone (galthno No. 2) whose victim was lost due to his/her name in the vicinity of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, is stolen.

As a result, Defendants conspired to acquire stolen cell phones.

2. On January 18, 2013, around 16:00, the Defendants purchased KRW 90,000 from G with knowledge of the fact that the lost victim of the false name in front of the F in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon is a stolen (galthno No. 1).

As a result, Defendants conspired to acquire stolen cell phones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. A written statement of G and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant Articles 362 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Confiscation Defendant B: Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;