대금 등 청구
1. The Defendant’s KRW 308,000,000 as well as 6% per annum from November 7, 2014 to July 15, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
1. The facts falling under any of the following subparagraphs of basic facts may be acknowledged either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the statements and images of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 10 to 12 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the whole purport of the pleadings:
At the time of the conclusion of the instant production support and indirect advertising contract, C (hereinafter “C”) advertised the instant site using the production support caption “F” on August 19, 2014, the trade name was changed to “Co., Ltd. C” on which August 19, 2014; hereinafter “C”) was made with the Defendant on May 23, 2014, as “E” produced and broadcasted in D, and as at the end of each broadcast of “E”, the production support caption of “F” on the web site operated by the Defendant at the time of the conclusion of the instant broadcast, and the remainder of the production support caption amounting to 308,00,000,000 (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) and indirect production support fund (within 123,200,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00.
B. On May 19, 2014, the Plaintiff (a trade name “stock company G” was changed to “stock company A”, which was a trade name in the past on November 3, 2014) was established by H as a special purpose company for the instant drama production. On May 27, 2014, H as the representative director of C, and H, who owned 100% of the shares, transferred the shares held and the management rights of C to I to May 27, 2014, acquired the status of the Plaintiff’s representative director as a party to the instant contract, which was possessed under the instant production support and indirect advertisement contract.
C. The Plaintiff manufactured the instant drama from June 3, 2014.