When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant of “2017 Highest 998” on June 24, 2017, on the ground that the Victim F, a police box affiliated with the Sinsan Police Station E box sent by the Defendant, who was reported on June 15, 2017, to the effect that he was frighting to a drunk in the D restaurant located in Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, by around 112, the victim F, a police box affiliated with the Sinsan Police Station E, was prevented from committing his act;

Doz. Doz.;

The victims were openly insultingd while the above restaurant business owners G et al. were satising by talking with the article and abusiveing them.

On November 9, 2017, 2017, the Defendant purchased beer at the J convenience store managed by the victim I in Gunsan-si, Sinsan-si on November 9, 2017, and purchased sand in the absence of card balance under the influence of alcohol, and caused the victim to buy sandbing location in the absence of a card balance, and caused the victim to get off the Kabter by the sound of the "cmination," but did not calculate, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business of managing convenience points by force for about one hour by avoiding disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 998"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The statement of the police with regard to G, F's accusation, and K's statement "2017 Highest 1486";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting down two copies of the 112-Report processing table and CCTVs at convenience stores;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of insult and the choice of fines) concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business and the selection of fines);

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts of both crimes) shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes;

3. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Application of the sentencing guidelines by choosing a penalty] is that the Defendant continues to be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and a fine for the same type of crime, which has been committed repeatedly, and each of the crimes of this case is committed during the period of repeated crimes of the same type of crime.