A. 1) The Plaintiff is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”)

2) Pursuant to the foregoing, B is a corporation that is entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor with the industrial accident compensation insurance business, and is a driver of the Ek-rayed vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) leased by C (hereinafter “C”) for D D, and the F is the owner of the instant Defendant vehicle, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with F as to the liability for damages arising from the operation of the instant Defendant vehicle.

3) C is the business owner entitled to industrial accident compensation insurance under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, and the victim G (hereinafter “victim”).

(B) On September 23, 2015, at the Dwork site located in H on September 23, 2015, the victim was a worker of C who suffered from the instant accident. (b) On September 23, 2015, while the victim was engaged in the electric wires connecting the boomer with the boomer in the instant vehicle operated by B, there was an accident where the boomer, away from the boomer of the Defendant vehicle operated by B, was shocked by its telegraph.

(2) At the time of the instant accident, B was on board a boomet attached to the end of the boom boom of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the head of the site office of C affiliated with C connected the boom pressure engine with the Defendant’s vehicle’s boom boom with the Defendant’s vehicle’s boom boom, and ordered B to drive the Defendant vehicle’s boom boom to raise the boom pressure engine above the utility pole. However, during the process where B operated the boom of the Defendant vehicle in this case, while driving the boom for the boom of the Defendant vehicle in this case and raising the boom pressure engine above the utility pole, it was found that the balone pressure engine was on the floor, and the accident in this case occurred. 3) At the time of the instant accident, the victim was on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in this case.