beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2017.03.30 2016고정184

모욕

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On January 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) deemed that the victim F was unable to work well at the location of nine village residents, such as E, within the D Village Center located in the Do community center located in the Do; and (b) and (c) did not work at the Domp in the Dom.

It is expected that the center will play in the center, and there will be a door door to the Dong and Dong.

“In other words, insult was made.”

2. Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 312 subparag. 1 of the Criminal Act (Revocation of a complaint filed by a victim after the institution of public prosecution in this case)