However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 20, 2015, at around 22:00, the Defendant driven a B truck while under the influence of alcohol, parked in D located in Pyeongtaek-si C, and, at the above rest area, the Defendant was placed with the nameless women parked in front of the Defendant’s truck while drinking in the alcohol at the rest area.

After that, at around 22:35 on the same day, the Defendant expressed his desire to take up the improvement inside the Defendant’s truck by stating that “I would like to take a look at the situation of drinking and assaulting a drinking operation and assault case from a slope G with a slope box affiliated with the sloping Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 of the above women in light of the above name,” and “I would like to take part in the Defendant’s truck,” and that I would interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning driving and criminal investigation by assaulting G, such as “I would come to governance, I would see, I would see, I would see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to G and H

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (finitely:6-1 year and April) (finite decision] (finite decision] and reflects the recognition of crimes, and the fact that there is no criminal record of the same kind of criminal record and the suspension of execution.