A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant began with the teaching system from November 25, 2014, and had a relationship of interest.

B. On March 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was liable to pay a fine of KRW 1 million to the Plaintiff as a result of the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents when driving the Plaintiff on board the Plaintiff’s father’s car and driving the Plaintiff; and (b) accordingly, the Plaintiff refused to divide the said fine into the Plaintiff.

C. On June 2016, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of his separate post, and the Defendant continuously attempted to have a telephone conversation to the Plaintiff, sent text messages to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff demanded that the Plaintiff continue to provide an extracurricular class with respect to the Defendant’s dual students.

On July 19, 2016, the Defendant, while making telephone conversations with the Plaintiff on July 19, 2016, threatened the Plaintiff with the complaint that the Plaintiff did not share the above fine and neglected to give extracurricular lessons to the Defendant’s dynamics, which read as “I will know about whether § 22 (b) or (3) or (4) or (4) or (3) or (4) or (4) or (4) or (4) or (4) or (5

In addition, immediately after the above intimidation, the Defendant sent a text message to the Plaintiff, “A part of the video, who is deemed to have only once sent,” and sent the Plaintiff’s photo taken as a patrolman on November 2015.

E. The Defendant was detained at the Ansan Police Station on August 22, 2016, on each of the criminal facts of attacking the following: “The Defendant taken a sexually related video against the Plaintiff’s will on November 2015,” which stated that “The Defendant was arrested by the Ansan Police Station on August 22, 2016, on the ground of a violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “violation of the Sexual Crimes Punishment Act”) (hereinafter “violation of the Sexual Crimes Punishment Act”) and “the Defendant threatened the Plaintiff with the Plaintiff by threateninging the Plaintiff, such as

F. On September 12, 2016, the Defendant was subject to a decision on September 12, 2016 at the competent district office within the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office to have jurisdiction over the violation of the above Sexual Violence Punishment Act, on the grounds that it is difficult to view the above sexually related dynamic images to have been taken in the future, but the Defendant was above.