물품대금
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of the claim.
As to this case, our court's reasoning is that "A evidence No. 18" was added to the evidence stated in No. 4, No. 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and "the defendant remitted 15 million won to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the plaintiff on September 24, 2012" to the end of No. 5, and the letter of No. 6, No. 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance "," and a letter of no. 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance that "I" was sold to D as the seller's qualification regardless of the plaintiff, regardless of whether the plaintiff is the plaintiff's representative. The defendant purchased the plaintiff on August 10, 2012 and purchased it from Oct. 17, 201 to the plaintiff from Oct. 20 of the same year. 20 of the same year, the defendant deducted the following contents from the part of the judgment of first instance as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
In addition, the defendant and his wife paid KRW 149,278,960 to the plaintiff on August 10, 2012 as the actual party to the contract that he purchased 1,350,000 won for 1,350 won for 1,350 won for 1,350 won for her own household. Thus, the defendant and her wife paid 149,278,960 won for 1,350 won to the plaintiff's agent, considering the overall purport of the entries and arguments in 10 through 16 (including each number) for 10,000 won, the defendant and her wife paid 1,350 won for 1,350 won for 1,350 won for 1,350 won for 200,000 won for 1,300 won for 18,48,46,205, respectively, for 25, 2012.