However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant was aware that from February 2016 to April 2, 2016, from the “D’s main point of the victim C’s operation on the first underground floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B building, the Defendant was working as an employee and the said main point’s question was located in the gap even if the correction was made.

Defendant 1 prepared to do so in advance, with the idea of theft of the two weeks stored at the display site at the above host point, and prepared to do so, around July 25, 2016, around 00:40, in front of the above host point, the Defendant 1:30 of 30, 30, 12 of 17, 17, 17, 5 sick, 17, 17, 17, 17, 34, 2, 2,251,00 the Victim’s sirens owned by the victim, which had been kept in custody, by inserting down the spoke by means of insertinging the spokes in the spokes of the spokes where the spokes were corrected, and invaded up to the display site at the host point.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site CCTV confirmation, tracking lines, etc.);

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that the amount of damage is not large, that some damage has been recovered, that there has been no previous convictions in the same kind, and that there has been no reflect