If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is the owner of a passenger car between C and C.

No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance, etc. shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, at around 10:10 on December 15, 2016, the Defendant operated the car between the above le-car, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, at the front of the branch office of the new bank and the branch office located in 30-33, 30-33, Kimcheon-si Corporation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article 46 of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicle Damages, and Selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of a passenger car between Les in the facts charged.

On December 15, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 10:10, and came to go through the crosssection of the office of the new Bank Corporation and its sub-office, located in 30-33, 2-gil Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a vehicle driving by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to drive safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused damage to the above cargo to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 582,032, which is the part front of the Defendant’s car, was 582,032, the part on the right-hand side of the E-Poter, the victim D, who was going to turn to the large 119 Safety Center in accordance with the new subparagraph by the negligence of entering the above intersection in violation of the signal.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act.

According to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the above crime is expressed by the victim.