A. Since the Defendant’s assertion that the following points that end on the bicycle lane at the construction site of new urban residential housing (C) in Sejong Special Self-Governing City (hereinafter “instant accident site”) have been used continuously after the public announcement of the commencement of the use of the road (2012-269) in Sejong Special Self-Governing City was made, the management entity is already deemed Sejong Special Self-Governing City.

B. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 25-1 and 4 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

1) “Special Act on the Construction of Multifunctional Administrative City in Yeongi-Gongju Area for Follow-up Measures for New Administrative Capital” (hereinafter “New Administrative Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act”).

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts, Article 66 shall be managed by a project implementer for public facilities installed through a multifunctional administrative city construction project until the public facilities revert to the management agency of such public facilities after completion.

"" is defined as ".

2. The main sentence of Article 18 (1) of the New Administrative Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act is "public institutions" under Article 4 of the Act on the Management of Public Institutions.

The project implementer shall be designated after deliberation by the Committee.

Accordingly, the defendant was designated as the project executor of the administrative city construction project.

3. The Multifunctional Administrative City project is in progress from May 24, 2005 to December 31, 2030 with respect to the area of Sejong Special Self-Governing City, Sejong Special Self-Governing City, Han-dong, Han-dong, and Dong-do, Yeong-do, including the place where the accident occurred.

According to the above facts, the management agency in the location of the accident of this case is not sufficient to recognize the road of this case as the management agency in Sejong Special Self-Governing City only with the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 2-1 through 12 of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3-1 through 3 of the evidence Nos. 3 of this case. The defendant's defense is without merit.