2. The judgment of the court below recognizes the criminal facts and reflects the criminal facts, and there are no criminal records exceeding the fine of the defendant, and some of the medical expenses were paid. However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant who is a taxi engineer without any reason, and the nature of the crime is not very good when considering the method of assault, the age of the victim, the degree of injury suffered by the victim, etc., the significant amount of the medical expenses was not recovered, and there is no agreement with the victim. There is no special circumstance or change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below was rendered, and there is no other circumstances or changes in circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.