2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

(a) Status 1 of the Parties : Kugu Automobile Sales Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Mad Automobile Sales”) that operated the automobile sales business and construction business;

(2) On August 10, 201, the Seoul Central District Court rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures as Seoul Central District Court Decision 201 Ma105, and thereafter, the order to obtain the rehabilitation plan was issued on December 9, 2011. 2) The sale of treatment automobile was divided into three companies, namely, one automobile sales company, treatment industry development company, and treatment-based development company (hereinafter “treatment-based development”) according to the above rehabilitation plan. On December 19, 2011, the bus sales company and construction company were divided into separate parts, and the treatment-based development company and treatment-based development company were divided into separate parts, and the treatment-based development company and treatment-based development company continued to exist in the remaining business sector except the business sector transferred to the company established by division on December 20, 2011.

3) After that, on July 22, 2014, a decision was made to discontinue the above rehabilitation procedure, and, thereafter, the treatment-based development was declared bankrupt on August 7, 2014 by the Seoul Central District Court 2014Hahap132, and at the same time, the Defendant was appointed as a bankruptcy trustee for treatment-based development. 4) The Plaintiff was working for treatment-based development as the sale of treatment-based vehicles was divided into the above, while the sale of treatment-based vehicles was serving for treatment-based development, and was subject to the notice of dismissal pursuant to the above decision of bankruptcy and retired on September 6, 2014.

B. On June 26, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking payment of KRW 4,516,396 in August 2014 with the Incheon District Court Decision 2015Da451615, excluding the Defendant’s wage of KRW 903,00 in September 2014, KRW 1,196,650 in September 1, 2014, KRW 239,340 in August 7, 2014, KRW 263,293 in annual allowance of KRW 50,00 in accommodation expenses, KRW 50,00 in mobile phone subsidies, KRW 92,50 in fuel expenses, KRW 3,97, KRW 500 in school expenses, KRW 37,97, KRW 500 in school expenses, KRW 1178,979, KRW 379,979, KRW 579,979, KRW 297,97,09.