The defendant and the victim B (the age of 51) are all types of punishment and the relationship between wife and wife.

At around 20:00 on February 21, 2018, the Defendant committed assault by the victim, who was found in order to comply with the terms of the agreement with the victim in his/her own residential area located in the Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun, with the aim of complying with the said agreement, such as dumping the flab, and setting up against it."

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness B and D;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The defendant and the defense counsel of the police statement as to B asserted that only the defendant took a bath to the victim at the time, and that there was no assault against the victim, such as breathing breath, etc. of the victim.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence revealed by the police, namely, the Defendant: (a) stated in the police that “the victim was deadly aware of the Defendant’s timber by intrusioning the Defendant’s residence on the day of the incident; (b) the Defendant’s wife was satisfing or pushing ahead with the Defendant’s her body; and (c) the Defendant’s body was terminated by using e-mail, etc.; (d) there was no special circumstance to suspect the arbity or credibility of the statement; (e) the victim made a consistent statement to the effect that he was assaulted as indicated in the facts of the crime from the investigative agency to this court; (c) the victim argued that he did not have any e-mail, but it is difficult for the Defendant to easily understand that he did not have any resistance or response in the victim’s e-mail while the Defendant was unable to kill the victim’s e-mail at the time of using the e-mail. However, the Defendant’s e-mail was made in line with the Defendant’s argument at the time of call or call.