beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.03.27 2014노82

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(상습상해)등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

A. In fact, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the date and time indicated in the list of crimes Nos. 13 in the judgment of the court below; (b) there was a fact that the victim was sealed at the time and time indicated in Nos. 16; (c) the victim was cleeped at the time and place indicated in Nos. 16; (d) there was a fact that the victim was brought in the vehicle at the time and place indicated in Nos. 18; (b) there was no injury or assault on each of the remaining charges; and (c) there was no habitually injury or assault on the victim

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

A. Various circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, including C, K, L, M, N, andO’s legal statement, each injury diagnosis statement, and general diagnosis statement, etc., in particular, ① the victim has made a statement in a relatively concrete and detailed fashion of each of the Defendant’s assault or bodily injury, ② the victim’s family members and relatives, as well as the victim’s family members and relatives, and the statements of neighbors, etc., who directly observed the case at the time of each of the crimes of this case or witnessed the situation before and after the crime of this case, correspond to the situation at the time of the victim’s statement, the injury injury level, and ③ the contents of the victim’s written diagnosis or diagnosis (the investigation record 91 through 93 pages) also coincide with each of the relevant parts of the crime of this case, and the date, degree, etc. of the injury, the victim was admitted to the victim at the time of the domestic violence victim’s rest.